Ladies Drive Magazine - Wies Bratby

Das Ende der Leistungsgesellschaft – Wies Bratby

Idee & Realisation: Sandra-Stella Triebl
Foto: Tomek Gola / www.gola.pro, Make-up: Angela Meleti
Location: B2 Hotel Zürich

Das Ende der Leistungsgesellschaft – Wies Bratby

Idee & Realisation: Sandra-Stella Triebl
Foto: Tomek Gola / www.gola.pro, Make-up: Angela Meleti
Location: B2 Hotel Zürich

Wies Bratby portraitiert und interviewt zum Thema "Das Ende der Leistungsgesellschaft" in der Ausgabe No 59 (Herbst 2022).

Wies Bratby

Ladies Drive Magazine - Wies Bratby

CEO Women In Negotiation
www.womeninnegotiation.org

If true meritocracy existed, there wouldn’t be a glass ceiling or a gender pay gap

To me, meritocracy and its tenet of providing the same opportunity for all, is an ideal to work towards. The notion that you can achieve whatever you desire if you’re willing to put in the work, and thus putting YOU in charge of your life, rather than some subjective outside criterion, is a hopeful one. Meritocracy is an incredibly attractive idea for someone like myself who works with women who, without fail, face biases based on their gender, colour of their skin, age or any other factor inside and outside the workplace.

I say it’s an ideal, because the reality is of course a little different and the link between skill/effort and results is often indirect at best. If true meritocracy existed, there wouldn’t be a glass ceiling or a gender pay gap or a broken rung on the career ladder, as women and other minorities would be assessed equally to their white, male colleagues.

Why do we often define ourselves by performance – instead of our values?

This is an interesting question, and I suspect it has a lot to do with the simple fact that performance is seemingly easier to assess. As performance can be measured objectively (or at least more objectively than values), it prevents all kinds of potentially uncomfortable debates. Looking at performance is then simply used as a short-cut, preferable in some situations where looking at values would require more nuance and further discussion, in a world that often requires black and white, quick decisions and clarity.
There are two immediate issues with this way of decision-making.

One is: who defines “performance”, who defines the standard of assessment? Those that are in power decide what is and what isn’t considered “best performance” of course, whose assessment is coloured by their own background, viewpoint and ways of thinking, and therefore subjective.

The other way in which biases are still present in meritocratic decision-making based on performance, is that even if you find and use objective performance metrics, these are still interpreted by humans, and thus – again – inherently subjective. There is plenty of research out there proving time and time again that even when we think we are seeing the world through an objective lens, we really aren’t.

So we’re coming full circle here: meritocracy is a wonderful ideal to strive towards, and the reality is often quite different.

I don’t think that we are at the end of meritocracy at all. Whatever my doubts are about the existence of meritocracy in its purest form, I am still seeing around me that the focus on data, on performance, is well and truly alive. Most people want to believe that their assessment of others is an objective one, so we focus on performance, on skill and effort.

In the recruitment and career development world that I operate in, this shows up as attention on metrics such as grades at university, hours logged behind our computers and KPIs achieved (in my opinion, only the last metric should be used to decide on salary, but that is a different discussion).

However, what I am also seeing happening, is a – slow but steady – move towards hiring decisions and performance assessment to include a cultural or values fit, too.
One could argue that this is an example of that “end of meritocracy”, and I would disagree with that and rather call this an adjustment in the right direction.

The development of meritocracy should be sought in including other decision makers in the definition of performance. As mentioned before, currently the decision on what or what doesn’t constitute skill/effort/performance, is made by the “old” powers, which leaves out viewpoints that should be included if we want to evolve to a truly just and equitable society and embrace meritocracy in the truest sense of the word. So a greater diversity there would make for a more meritocratic world.

To address the other issue mentioned before, on the inherent subjectivity related to humans interpreting “performance” and thus creating biases in their decision-making, it’s interesting to look at one particular example of how this was achieved in the workplace.

A study in which the researchers had male and female musicians apply for a position in an orchestra saw the number of female musicians rise dramatically when they played behind a screen, i.e. anonymously. Therefore, if we are looking at reducing biases in the workplace and achieving a better level of meritocracy, one very practical improvement would be to introduce anonymity in a lot of the processes.


Weitere Interviews in der Serie „Das Ende der Leistungsgesellschaft“:

Zurück zum Einführungsartikel

Veröffentlicht am März 04, 2023

Bitte teilen Sie diesen Beitrag

Ladies Drive Magazine

Ladies Drive Magazin Vol. 63 - Herbstausgabe 2023
Vol.63 jetzt am Kiosk!

Ausgewählte Artikel

Retrospektive – Female Innovation Forum 2023

Retrospektive – Female Innovation Forum 2023

«Wir sind hier, um uns zu feiern!», verkündete Moderatorin Lizan Kuster enthusiastisch in ihrer Begrüssung der Gäste an der 6. Ausgabe des Female Innovation Forum im BMW Group Brand Experience Center in Dielsdorf. Und das haben wir sowas von!

Die 70/70-Regel

Die 70/70-Regel

Ausgerechnet im Kanton Schwyz, dem man gerne unterstellt, nicht ganz so progressiv zu sein, erst recht nicht, wenn es um die Gleichstellung der Geschlechter geht, erblüht gerade ein Mentoring-Programm für Berufseinsteigerinnen. Dabei geht es nicht nur um Karriereplanung, Auftrittskompetenz und Lohnverhandlungen, sondern auch darum, dass es äusserst unschlau ist, als Mutter die Karriere an den Nagel zu hängen. Weshalb das so ist und was es mit der 70/70-Regel auf sich hat, erklärt Claudia Hiestand, Mitinitiatorin und Programmleiterin des Schwyzer Mentoring-Programms.

Ladies Drive No 63 Editorial: Weisheiten in Zeiten des Dramas

Ladies Drive No 63 Editorial: Weisheiten in Zeiten des Dramas

Jeder in der Gen Z, der sich in den sozialen Medien bewegt, weiss, dass ein Drama die zwingende Voraussetzung dafür ist, gehört und gesehen zu werden. Auf TikTok und Co. ist das gang und gäbe. Irgendwie scheinen Dramen mittlerweile jedoch allerorts zu sein, und die Welt scheint regelrecht zu vibrieren, kein Stein bleibt auf dem anderen, nix ist mehr fix, und die disruptive Transformation unserer Welt geht weiter und beschert uns eine Zukunft, die immer mehr Fragezeichen aufwirft und immer mehr Krisen zutage fördert.

Folgt uns in den sozialen Medien, um in Kontakt zu bleiben und erfährt mehr über unsere Business Sisterhood!

#BusinessSisterhood     #ladiesdrive

Möchten Sie Neuigkeiten über zukünftige Veranstaltungen erhalten?